Bloody
Harvest
(II)
(continuation)
As a matter of
fact, the same peculiar type of incisions and excisions characteristic of
cattle mutilation cases, was found all over the body: eyes and ears removed leaving
plug like holes, lips and flesh excised around the mandibles, emptied mouth
cavity, removal of sexual and intestinal parts...
Photo #1
The autopsy report states:
"EXTERNAL EXAMINATION: We observed:
1) Cut off of the external ear by a slanting incision, with hollowing of soft
parts; 2) removal of internal ear with indications of vital reaction; 3)
enucleation of right and left ocular globes, with signs of blood inside the
cavities"
Summing up the removal or hollowing of
other parts:
"16) We observed the removal of the
right and left orbital areas, emptying of the mouth cavity, pharynx,
oropharynx, neck, right and left armpit area, abdomen, pelvic cavity, right and
left groin area".
Photo #2
The reference
to "vital reaction" means that the wound was inflicted
upon a live body, not on a dead one. This information is repeated in other
parts of the report, for example:
"8) The left and the right armpit
areas exhibit a circular discontinuity [round hole], with 4 centimeters of
diameter, with regular borders and hollowing of soft parts, with signs of vital
reaction".
"21) Absence of organs In the
pelvis and abdominal cavity due to the removal of all viscera, with signs of
tearing and vital reaction".
The most
evident indication of vital reaction are the blue-black haematomas (formed by
the effusion of blood under the skin) that can be clearly seen as a mask over
the eyes, around the ears, under the chin, as a rectangle around the hole near
the right armpit...
Photo
#3
... and around similar holes with
regular borders clearly seen in the navel and at the thigh, near the left groin
area, that appears to have been produced by a "cookie cutter" type of
instrument.
Photo #3a
An extensive
haematoma can also be observed throughout the whole length of the very bruised,
stretched penis, that wasn't excised like the scrotum, but showed an enlarged urethral
channel (the red tip of which can be seen in the photo) suggesting that the
prostate gland was extracted through it.
Photo #4
The official
occurrence bulletin says the body was found simply lieing on the damp soil
completely unbound, without signs of having been previously chained or tied.
[The piece of rope found to be tied to the right arm during the autopsy was
used later, to fasten the body to the stretcher for removal, as shown in the
next photo]. There was no signs of fighting nor any indication of the presence
of other people in the island.
The possibility
that such a horrible butchery had been inflicted upon a live victim, possibly
paralyzed, brings to the mind the story related by Linda Moulton Howe about a
mutilated bull found in 1981, in Colorado, with dried traces of exudation that
trickled down along the muzzle from both its removed eyes, in such a way that
it could only have occurred if it were standing up, meaning that whoever
excised its eyes, removed its tongue, the sexual parts and the rectum, did all
that with the animal still alive, paralyzed and standing on its own legs.
A very
improbable and incredible thing, absolutely preposterous: who in this world
would be inhuman enough to do that to a paralyzed, conscious animal?
And now, we
have the official register of a human person submitted to the same kind of
treatment while still alive. Would it be possible that he was conscious during
the mutilation?
The sobering answer, given by the
autopsy, is a resounding yes!
"INTERNAL EXAMINATION: ...after
opening the cranial cavity using Griessinger technique we found: 17) unimpaired
skullcap; 18) cerebral edema".
In a case like that, the presence of
cerebral edema without direct traumatic origin is a strong characteristic of an
agonizing death. In confirmation, the
autopsy CONCLUSION explicitly states as causa mortis (cause of the
death):
"...acute haemorhage in multiple
traumatisms. There is a component of causa mortis by vagus
stimulation" [implying cardio-respiratory arrest caused by extreme pain].
"The victim shows injuries with vital reaction characteristics, i.e.,
there is the component "torture". The suggested modus operandi
is: incisions in soft parts and natural orifices using sucking devices".
Photos #5 and #5a
"23) The thoracic viscera (i.e., non abdominal organs) were in
their normal place".
In spite of the
fact that the vascular system was practically drained, there was no signs of
haemorrage in the body, or on the site the body was found.
One of the MD
that was part of the autopsy commented on the incongruity of the fact that the
victim was wearing shorts (strangely free from a single drop of blood) when was
found, so whoever was responsible for the crime, put the shorts back on the
body after the carnage. He said that what baffled him more than anything else
was how could so much muscular mass and lymph nodes be removed through small
holes (as can be clearly seen in Photos #3 and #4, near the armpit and groin)
without tearing apart the connecting tissue adhered to the skin.
But all these
are irrelevant details compared to the -- in this case -- impossible to deny
reality of the mutilation itself.
There have been
attempts to discredit the case by attributing the mutilation to the work of
small mice and by getting latter days testimony of people who declared that
buzzards were all over the body, when the disposal team arrived, but the
concrete fact is that in this case we have a body that was examined by
professional forensic Medicine Doctors that would certainly recognize the
difference between randomly inflicted wounds produced by animals, from
deliberate, artificially produced cuts, made by instruments.
So, happily, in
the Guarapiranga case we have an official document describing the wounds, and
clear photographs for comparison, because this time the researcher was allowed
to keep the photos, at last.
All along the
autopsy report, the artificiality and surgical deliberation of the incisions
are very clearly described, for example:
"10) Elliptic, elongated incision
with 3 cm x 1 cm axis, at the left groin crease."
"14) Removal of the anal orifice
with ample incision, oval shaped, elongated, with 15 cm x 8 cm
axis". Etc, etc....
Then, in this
case, there is no way out of the definitive conclusion provided by an EITHER /
OR binary type of proposition:
EITHER:
A bunch of
absolutely inhuman, mad Brazilian ufologists developed specialized equipment to
imitate the cattle mutilation signature, and killed an innocent victim, closely
following a script destined to back the supposed White Sands mutilation of Sgt.
Louette;
OR:
The horribly
mutilated body of the Brazilian victim is proof enough of the truthfulness of
both Sgt. Louette's case and the New Zealand report, and many others, meaning
that we will have to face the grim reality of all these cases, the sooner the
better.
The
impossibility to protect the planet against this kind of cold blooded creatures
has probably been one of the main reasons for the endurance of the UFO / ET
cover up, which, under the circumstances, seems to be a policy not too
difficult to justify.